"In utero" sonographic diagnosis is possible when characteristic features such as bilateral bowed femurs and tibia, clubbed feet, prominent curvature of the neck, a bell-shaped chest, pelvic dilation, and/or an undersized jaw are apparent

Radiographic techniques are generally used only postnatally and also rely on prototypical physical characteristics.

Genetic screening is also typically done postnatally, including PCR typing of microsatellite DNA and STS markers as well as comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) studies using DNA microarrays.

In some cases PCR and sequencing of the entire "SOX9" gene is used to diagnose CMD.

Many different translocation breakpoints and related chromosomal aberrations in patients with CMD have been identified.

In terms of the diagnosis of Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy upon inspection follicular hyperkeratosis, may be a dermatological indicator, additionally also serum creatine kinase may be mildly above normal. Other exams/methods to ascertain if the individual has Ullrich congenital muscular dystrophy are:

For the diagnosis of congenital muscular dystrophy, the following tests/exams are done:

- Lab study (CK levels)

- MRI (of muscle, and/or brain)

- EMG

- Genetic testing

The subtypes of congenital muscular dystrophy have been established through variations in multiple genes. It should be noted that phenotype, as well as, genotype classifications are used to establish the subtypes, in some literature.

One finds that congenital muscular dystrophies can be either autosomal dominant or autosomal recessive in terms of the inheritance pattern, though the latter is much more common

Individuals who suffer from congenital muscular dystrophy fall into one of the following "types":

The prognosis of this sub-type of MD indicates that the affected individual may eventually have feeding difficulties. Surgery, at some point, might be an option for scoliosis.

Scoliosis which is a sideways curve of the persons vertebrate, is determined by a variety of factors, including the degree (mild or severe), in which case if possible a brace might be used by the individual

At present, Nemaline myopathy does not have a cure. Nemaline myopathy is a very rare disease that only effects 1 out of 50,000 on average, although recent studies show that this number is even smaller. There are a number of treatments to minimize the symptoms of the disease. The treatments and procedures to help patients with nemaline myopathy vary depending on the severity of the disease. A possible accommodation could be the use of a stabilizer, such as a brace. Other means include moderate stretching and moderate exercise to help target muscles maintain maximum health.

As people with NM grow and develop throughout their lives, it is important for them to see a variety of health professionals regularly, including a neurologist, physical therapist, and others, such as speech therapists and psychologists, to help both the patient and family adjust to everyday life.

Although there is no cure for NM, it is possible, and common for many people live healthy active lives even with moderate to severe cases. Research continues to seek ways to ameliorate debilitating symptoms and lengthen the life-span in quality ways for those affected. Some people have seen mild improvements in secretion handling, energy level, and physical functioning with supplemental L-tyrosine, an amino acid that is available through health centers. Some symptoms may worsen as the patient ages. Muscle loss increases with age naturally, but it is even more significant with nemaline myopathy.

It has been suggested that the natural history of TMD is benign and self-limiting, with symptoms slowly improving and resolving over time. The prognosis is therefore good. However, the persistent pain symptoms, psychological discomfort, physical disability and functional limitations may detriment quality of life. It has been suggested that TMD does not cause permanent damage and does not progress to arthritis in later life, however degenerative disorders of the TMJ such as osteoarthritis are included within the spectrum of TMDs in some classifications.

Various diagnostic systems have been described. Some consider the Research Diagnostic Criteria method the gold standard. Abbreviated to "RDC/TMD", this was first introduced in 1992 by Dworkin and LeResche in an attempt to classify temporomandibular disorders by etiology and apply universal standards for research into TMD. This method involves 2 diagnostic axes, namely axis I, the physical diagnosis, and axis II, the psychologic diagnosis. Axis I contains 3 different groups which can occur in combinations of 2 or all 3 groups, (see table).

McNeill 1997 described TMD diagnostic criteria as follows:

- Pain in muscles of mastication, the TMJ, or the periauricular area (around the ear), which is usually made worse by manipulation or function.

- Asymmetric mandibular movement with or without clicking.

- Limitation of mandibular movements.

- Pain present for a minimum of 3 months.

The International Headache Society's diagnostic criteria for "headache or facial pain attributed to temporomandibular joint disorder" is similar to the above:

- A. Recurrent pain in one or more regions of the head or face fulfilling criteria C and D

- B. X-ray, MRI or bone scintigraphy demonstrate TMJ disorder

- C. Evidence that pain can be attributed to the TMJ disorder, based on at least one of the following:

- pain is precipitated by jaw movements or chewing of hard or tough food

- reduced range of or irregular jaw opening

- noise from one or both TMJs during jaw movements

- tenderness of the joint capsule(s) of one or both TMJs

- D. Headache resolves within 3 months, and does not recur, after successful treatment of the TMJ disorder